Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/feedavenue.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Opendoor Is In $62M Worth Of Legal Trouble: The Real Word - Feedavenue
Monday, December 23, 2024
HomeReal StateOpendoor Is In $62M Worth Of Legal Trouble: The Real Word

Opendoor Is In $62M Worth Of Legal Trouble: The Real Word

Date:

Related stories

spot_imgspot_img



In a shifting real estate market, the guidance and expertise that Inman imparts is never more valuable. Whether at our events, or with our daily news coverage and how-to journalism, we’re here to help you build your business, adopt the right tools — and make money. Join us in person in Las Vegas at Connect, and utilize your Select subscription for all the information you need to make the right decisions. When the waters get choppy, trust Inman to help you navigate.

Byron Lazine and Nicole White are two agents in Connecticut who give us their thoughts on the week’s news every Friday in “The Real Word,” a weekly video column on Inman.

Byron Lazine is solo in this week’s episode discussing the Federal Trade Commission’s $62 million fine imposed on Opendoor involving allegations wherein sellers made thousands of dollars less with Opendoor than they would have made selling their homes through traditional methods while Opendoor misrepresented the benefits of their services. Opendoor has answered prior lowball offer allegations, saying they’re “just not true” while Lazine says that Opendoor has gone out of its way to “crap on” real estate agents.

Next, Lazine looked at a new report from Canadian company Tangerine.ca looking at the top 10 markets where homes are taking the longest to sell. Lazine said that the study was flawed because it pulled from Zillow statistics over the last four years, making it essentially meaningless. This type of story is the kind of thing that gives consumers bad information and good agents should be shredding these “studies”.





Source link

Latest stories

spot_img